Here’s looking at Euclid
24 June, 2009
(Recently discovered verses of Emily Dickinson, apparently penned upon posthumously reading the first two definitions from T.L. Heath’s translation of Euclid’s Elements.)
A point is that which has no part,
a line is breadthless length;
and those who read in Euclid’s book
shall go from strength to strength.
Because I could not stop for Heath
he kindly stopped for me;
the carriage held but just ourselves
and Plane Geometry.
I never saw a radius
or two or four or three,
Yet I know how the circle looks,
and what a line must be.
Lines are the things with measures
that perch upon a plane,
and have the length–without the width
and never meet again.
I never drew diameters
nor bisected a line,
yet certain am I of their place
as if the proofs were mine.
Entry Filed under: Quodlibet. .
1 Comment Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Emily | 1 July, 2009 at 7:05
Matt’s comment: How long do you think he’s been waiting to say “Here’s looking at Euclid”?